A few days ago I asked the Hot Copper Brains Trust if NAG was liable for EPA Levies on its PASS disposal site. This related specifically to the issue of the true revenue potential of the site. Much back and forth and fun was had in that thread.
I have taken my question one step further. I asked the Victoria EPA and here is the result. I kept the question generic to avoid any possible legal limits on their response.
My question:
Victoria EPA response:
If NAG's site falls under the definition of an "EPA licensed landfill site" then I assume the levy applies. Personally, this has no effect on my valuation on NAG. My opinion is the current SP is in the ball park of fair value (maybe a little under). If NAG makes a formal statement contradicting any of this, I will adjust my valuation.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- The Great EPA Levy Saga
A few days ago I asked the Hot Copper Brains Trust if NAG was...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NAG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.763M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | $4.549K | 413.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 172000 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.1¢ | 367341 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 172000 | 0.010 |
11 | 1533430 | 0.009 |
5 | 1016000 | 0.008 |
1 | 160000 | 0.007 |
1 | 250000 | 0.006 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.011 | 367341 | 4 |
0.012 | 163334 | 3 |
0.013 | 52383 | 1 |
0.014 | 160615 | 1 |
0.015 | 658165 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.14am 17/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NAG (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online