Just saw your post Bluey. I think whoever gave him the idea that it could be taken to a landfill site was wrong. Underwater storage is a permanent solution and won't need monitoring well into the future. Why would the EPA want to charge a levy to someone who solves one of their biggest problems?
The Great EPA Levy Saga, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NAG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.54M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.7¢ | $32.47K | 1.844M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4547943 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8¢ | 300000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NAG (ASX) Chart |