the greatest fraud in the history of science, page-74

SNuff, are you suggesting that you think Bolt knows something about science? Or do you accept that he either spouts off his uninformed opinion and/or copies straight from denialist blogs (both of which he tends to do).

If you think that a paper would be accepted just for saying that coral in a particular location is dying, without any further measurement or analysis of the causes - that would suggest you don't read the literature.

If you want to argue against accepted science then you have to have exceptional evidence and a sound theory. Contrarians here don't produce any evidence - most don't even discuss the science, they just snipe at posters who do discuss it.