This whole thing has me questioning motives. Mollers report lists all the inconsistencies in Britts story and doesn’t make mention that Bruce’s story is most probably bullshit.Although it’s in an another report. I am not a court of law and as an observer I work on who’s story is more believable. Anyway as you say the coppers reckon Britts a liar, that’s hard to argue with. Thanks for the reply.
