I don't think that argument works anywhere near as well as you think it does:
- Interconnects between individual towns throughout Australia will each be a single fibre optic cable, and will be the same regardless of model. The vast majority of the cost is within towns/cities, not between them. This isn't a point of differentiation between FTTH and fraudband.
- One of the biggest headaches for the full FTTH roll-out was how to get the fibre to every apartment in existing high-rises. This is a problem that gets worse with high population density, not better. Personally I think the obvious thing there would be to run the so-called fibre-to-the-basement model - basically putting a connection into the basement of each building and letting the managers work out what to do from there, but I digress.
- The most sparsely populated regions of the country were the ones to be covered by fixed wireless or satellite, not by rolling out fibre.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- The importance of NBN/High speed internet.
I don't think that argument works anywhere near as well as you...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online