This might be in the top 5 worst investment thesis I've read. If anything, it's solid evidence of the first post - it's just a gamblers stock.
It's been explained at least a dozen times but the Motley Fool free site is just an aggregate of free lancers. There's no collective mindset. Your post might as well say two political contributors support different parties. Not sure why people find this so hard to understand.
None of the MF paid services, which do have directives and responsible persons, have recommended SGH.
This might be in the top 5 worst investment thesis I've read. If...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)