You nailed the frog, Director. For example, he posted that there should be changes in the asset test. He writes in a less than precise manner, but I presumed (as it turned out correctly) that he was referring to an increase in the lower levels before people can access the lowest level/s of part pension. I pointed out that had already been done, very recently. His response was that he knew that but that "it was not enough". By responding in that manner one would presume he would justify such a response, revealing his, in detail, knowledge of the recent asset changes, both at the lower and the upper levels. The changes are quite sophisticated really but no revelation by the frog that he was across any of it at all. My conclusion is that his knowledge base is very superficial indeed. I would have expected better from my secondary school students in Economics. Year 11 students would be admonished by me, and Year 12 had better not even try it on, lol.
