OK, sorry to put the dampers on this, but this cobalt does not exist.
I know, it sounds like I am making this up.
However, i have used these XRF analyzers in the past and you get spurious cobalt readings with certain models when you analyse iron-rich materials because the emission peak of iron overlaps with that of cobalt, and hence the machine tells you that you have high cobalt because it is mis-reading the result.
This is, unfortunately, what i believe is happening here. For instance, the cobalt zones overlap exactly with the zones of pyrite (Fe), and the ratio of Fe:Co is constant across the two zones. This is what you would expect from the XRF analyzer returning spurious cobalt results.
I would be very careful about investing in this ahead of seeing the laboratory assay results confirming these zones.
MTB Price at posting:
1.1¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)