"I agree with all of that still. In fact all of that post is incredibly prescient. "
Mwwhahahahah.
Which parts are so incredibly prescient?
- The significance of 9 November in numerology terms? (Just not 9 November 2016, evidently)?
- "Widespread unrest by an unhappy US citizenry" following the US election?
- "Large, widespread terrorist attacks in the US on election day"?
- Imminent cyber warfare between the US and Russia?
- "An outright attack on Aleppo by Russia and Syria at the time of the US election"?
- "The horror show that likely on Wednesday 9 November 2016, because things were "eerily similar" to the 1987 crash, due to something about "If we see monday and tuesday as down days there will have been an unprecedented number of sequential days of loss after loss."?
- The bond market crash which, at the time, was imminent, because interest rates would surprise to the upside and would do so very soon?
I could go on, but I think you get my drift.
PS. Don't take it personally that I respond directly to your post.
It's just that I've spent the better part of thirty years coming across hyperbolic and unsubstantiated views such as yours, of pending doom and "imminent" collapse of the "system".
Your post is merely one that I find so neatly encapsulates this multi-generational stuck record.
So every time I read or hear something about the gold price, your post automatically comes to mind.
