These aren't conspiracies. They are poorly formed scientific conclusions.
Thats the difference between things like 'moon landing' which is a conspiracy.
Vs 'Climate change' which is poorly formed scientific conclusions.
You can see the fact the author of paper is unable to understand that difference illustrates how poor scientific conclusions can be born. He uses fancy numbers that don't actually test nor prove what the author thinks they prove.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- The maths behind why large scale conspiracies eventually fail
These aren't conspiracies. They are poorly formed scientific...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)