@whereu,
You ask for examples, so let’s start with the most recent:
✔️ You falsely claimed I equated atheists and Muslims as having the same beliefs. That’s a clear misrepresentation of my words. I clarified I was referring to a shared objection they often raise about Yeshua’s divinity—not that they believe the same overall. You twisted that to suggest I was lumping people into one category, which I never did. That’s a misrepresentation.
✔️ You frequently use phrases like “rubbish” and “word salad” in response to my posts. That’s not respectful disagreement—that’s sarcasm and mockery. If you truly want an honest conversation, then engage with the points raised rather than insulting the person who raises them.
✔️ You claim I don’t allow disagreement, yet ignore how often I’ve said I’m fine with people disagreeing—as long as they back it up with Scripture and avoid personal attacks. You’re creating a false narrative that I equate disagreement with disrespect, which simply isn’t true.
✔️ And now you’re back to making the conversation about me personally, rather than the content of what I’ve actually shared. That’s exactly what I was pointing out before. When people don’t engage the topic directly, and instead focus on who’s posting it—it stops being a discussion and becomes a distraction.
So yes, those are clear examples. You’ve made a habit of personalising your disagreements with me instead of sticking to the topic.
If you genuinely want to move forward respectfully, then let’s start by dealing with what is written—not assumptions about each other.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- The Misunderstanding
The Misunderstanding, page-133
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
PAR
PARADIGM BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED..
Paul Rennie, MD & Founder
Paul Rennie
MD & Founder
SPONSORED BY The Market Online