the never anwserd question, page-9

  1. 30,924 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 174
    Well, an explanation as to why CO2 levels of 6,000ppm in the past didn't cause the earth to overheat would be a start.

    Or why water vapour, of which there is an unknown quantity in the atmosphere, is usually ignored in the argument for GW (estimates vary from 2% to 4%).

    It is up to the warmists to show, prove, that CO2 is the bad guy. Not up to us to prove it isn't. But past geological evidence indicates it is not relevant - therefore the models must be wrong. There was a thread today on the sea levels - they are NOT rising.

    It's up to the GW advocates to come up with proof. I can't possibly say what, or where, would satisfy me on the AGW - all I know is that nothing has come close yet.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.