I’ve noticed other BNPL companies are charging significantly higher fees around 8%. Anyone know why Spt does not charge similar amount for their funded model?
The non-funded is around 2.3% which is quite low in my opinion as well. If Spt was to average say 5% it would make a huge difference to the revenue.
example :
MSV $150m would be $7.5m revenue.
MSV $200m would be $10m revenue.
it would certainly put the company in a better position.
I mean still cheaper than other BNPL
just curious if anyone has any thoughts on this or know why Spt is cutting itself short compare to the others.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- The Next Chapter
I’ve noticed other BNPL companies are charging significantly...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,791 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)