the occupied territories... france's, that is, page-5

  1. 520 Posts.
    re: jimjj-re france's-well done - a must read The French govt is representing the will of its people (unlike the Aust. govt) and saying that a case for invading Iraq hasnt been made. Its a principled stance and isnt anti US but anti a dangerous and illogical policy.

    The French were the ones that advocated sending ground troops into Yugoslavia when the US were content to bomb from 10,000 feet so the old cliches about the deVichey WWII govt are a bit stale.

    Bush would do well to take a look at the Statue of Liberty and remember who built it and what it stands for.

    ***

    Here's another take on the madness of Bush's posn.

    The following is an article by Terry Jones of Monty Python fame, as printed
    in
    The Observer on Sunday January 26, 2003.

    I'm really excited by George W. Bush's latest reason for bombing Iraq: he's
    running out of patience.

    And so am I! For some time now I've been really pissed off with Mr Johnson,

    who lives a couple of doors down the street. Well, him and Mr Patel, who
    runs
    the health food shop. They both give me queer looks, and I'm sure Mr
    Johnson
    is planning something nasty for me, but so far I haven't been able to
    discover
    what. I've been round to his place a few times to see what he's up to, but

    he's got everything well hidden. That's how devious he is.

    As for Mr Patel, don't ask me how I know, I just know - from very good
    sources - that he is, in reality, a Mass Murderer. I have leafleted the
    street
    telling them that if we don't act first, he'll pick us off one by
    one.

    Some of my neighbours say, if I've got proof, why don't I go to the police?

    But that's simply ridiculous. The police will say that they need evidence
    of
    a crime with which to charge my neighbours. They'll come up with endless red

    tape and quibbling about the rights and wrongs of a pre-emptive strike and
    all
    the while Mr Johnson will be finalising his plans to do terrible things to
    me,
    while Mr Patel will be secretly
    murdering people. Since I'm the only one in the street with a decent range
    of
    automatic firearms, I
    reckon it's up to me to keep the peace. But until recently that's been a
    little difficult. Now, however, George W. Bush has made it clear that all I

    need to do is run out of patience, and then I can wade in and do whatever I

    want!

    And let's face it, Mr Bush's carefully thought-out policy towards Iraq is
    the
    only way to bring about international peace and security. The one certain
    way
    to stop Muslim fundamentalist suicide bombers targeting the US or the UK is
    to
    bomb a few Muslim countries that have never threatened us.

    That's why I want to blow up Mr Johnson's garage and kill his wife and
    children. Strike first! That'll teach him a lesson. Then he'll leave us in
    peace and stop peering at me in that totally unacceptable way.

    Mr Bush makes it clear that all he needs to know before bombing Iraq is
    that
    Saddam is a really nasty man and that he has weapons of mass destruction -
    even if no one can find them. I'm certain I've just as much justification
    for
    killing Mr Johnson's wife and children as Mr Bush has for bombing Iraq.

    Mr Bush's long-term aim is to make the world a safer place by
    eliminating 'rogue states' and 'terrorism'. It's such a clever long-term
    aim
    because how can you ever know when you've achieved it? How will Mr Bush
    know
    when he's wiped out all terrorists? When every single terrorist is dead?
    But
    then a terrorist is only a terrorist once he's committed an act of terror.
    What about would-be terrorists? These are the ones you really want to
    eliminate, since most of the known terrorists, being suicide bombers, have
    already eliminated themselves.

    Perhaps Mr Bush needs to wipe out everyone who could possibly be future
    terrorist? Maybe he can't be sure he's achieved his objective until every
    Muslim fundamentalist is dead? But then some moderate Muslims might convert
    to
    fundamentalism. Maybe the only really safe thing to do would be for Mr
    Bush
    to eliminate all Muslims?

    It's the same in my street. Mr Johnson and Mr Patel are just the tip of the

    iceberg. There are dozens of other people in the street who I don't like
    and
    who - quite frankly - look at me in odd ways. No one will be really safe
    until
    I've wiped them all out. My wife says I might be going too far but I tell
    her
    I'm simply using the same logic as the President of the United States. That
    shuts her up.

    Like Mr Bush, I've run out of patience, and if that's a good enough reason
    for
    the President, it's good enough for me. I'm going to give the whole street
    two
    weeks - no, 10 days - to come out in the open and hand over all aliens and

    interplanetary hijackers, galactic outlaws and interstellar terrorist
    masterminds, and if they don't hand them over nicely and say 'Thank you',
    I'm
    going to bomb the entire street to kingdom come.

    It's just as sane as what George W. Bush is proposing - and, in contrast to
    what he's intending, my policy will destroy only one street.


    Guardian Unlimited (c) Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.