That was written in 2010. A glance at the data (RATPAC or RSS) says that the statement is technically correct - but it’s truly disappointing to see someone from NOAA falling into the trap of discussing the lack of a significant trend over a time period too short for the trend to emerge from the noise. Whoever wrote it really should have consulted a statistician.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- The pause that was and then was not!
That was written in 2010. A glance at the data (RATPAC or RSS)...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)