Just consider this for a minute. Has that lone blogger ever apologised for the numerous mistakes, libels, defamatory posts and gross and deliberate allowing of misinformation posted on his blog?
Was that article really an apology? Does NASA usually apologise to the Telegraph? How often has the Telegraph apologised to the public for leading them astray, or to climate scientists for publishing false information about them?
Did the error really result in any difference to the global climate record (no), so what is the point you are trying to make.
Has there been a publication as large as the IPCC report that had so few errors?
How many bloggers and posters apologise for making errors vs the number who point to a single error and use it to say "it's all a hoax", "climate change isn't real", and how many posters consistently play the role of concern troll on this forum (not too many concern trolls, thankfully. Most 'skeptics' here are honest and up front about it.)
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- the peer review process
the peer review process, page-3
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
AGC
AUSTRALIAN GOLD AND COPPER LTD
Glen Diemar, MD
Glen Diemar
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online