"In particular I would like to ask the (current) climate-science supporters if this sort of stuff even bothers them? Or can you guys happily just accept that the entire consesus can make a mistake and this is the only one they made?"
Of course it bothers me. I'm sure there are other mistakes. The peer review process has never been perfect. Soientists are human and have the associated failings.
But this does not mean that all climate science can be discarded. I have no doubt that 99% of it is genuine and accurate. Assuming anything else is too close to conspiracy theory territory.
