I'm very satisfied with the process, as our court system is usually very fair and just. In Australia we very rarely convict people who are years later found to be not guilty. The judge didn't allow the claims of Pell touching up a couple of kids in a swimming pool in Balarat to be heard, which benefited Pell's defense. It was a closed court process which also benefited Pell's defense. Nobody in this thread was in the courtroom and heard any of the evidence so are in zero position to challenge the judge's decision. Pell's own lawyer said after the decision was handed down that it was merely " no more than a plain vanilla sexual penetration case" which imo says a lot. I think it's wrong to say the media is asking questions about the verdict, as all media isn't, it seems to be the conservative media who have jumped on this in an attempt to discredit the verdict in preparation for the appeal. Just gru**..oops I mean mates looking after mates, just like Pell supported Risdale.
- Forums
- General
- The Pell case
The Pell case, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online