so a few examples are present on this forum of you spreading...

so a few examples are present on this forum of you spreading misinformation the 'photo of the pipe' is one, there's the one example.

hahahaha your very best example of "misinformation" is posting a pic of the mine and asking if people can find the supposed pipe thats there that the seller couldnt label on request?

, a few of your posts mention there's no REE
Show me one post where I said theres no REEs Where I could show a heap where I discuss the REEs there.

You asked about water in the pit,
I understood it was ok but then the lead problem seems to be contributed to by the pit water which was stated wasnt there. As I had suggested. Yes.

you asked where the water came from,
The sea and no tests for sea wall fracturing or able to be done or pump out approvals. As I had suggested. Yes.

there's a pipe that connects the pit,
Where? No one found it did they. Not even the owner showed us on the pic.

you ask about pollution,
Not anymore because there were no answers besides "no lead" etc as detailed in this thread in the pit and I found there is lead in the pit which according to the above reports contributes to the local contamination issues up to 50,000 above normal sea water. Yes


the pit isn't the main source (tailings thrown in the sea was the main source).
I said contributing as does the report. Do you disagree? So if we pump all that water out thats been sitting in the pit and tunnels for years will it require approval and how long will it take when other companies have taken many years.

yet you are completely oblivious to Naglia, Liverpool and Mary Valley
No, Naglia has far less lead and zinc results then the pit.

ignoring the high mineralisation in Gronnedal
With Eu? Do you want links to my input you suggest are not there?

Obviously in your questioning of me you have missed all these discoveries. Why? Are you upramping