"nro there you go again stretching the truth there is no zinc ,thorium or fluorine pollution at the epm site while the lead pollution occurred over 100 years ago and is steadily but slowly falling . no further lead pollution is expected from emptying the pit . on the other hand ggg has a major soluble fluorine problem along with thorium ,phosphate ,radon, actinium, thallium etc etc and as for lead no one knows; this intrusion contains quite a bit of lead both in galena and as native lead and i suspect only a large representative sample will show if lead is a problem. something which in my opinion has not yet occurred on the ggg site. (if you dont believe me read the comments by the local community geologists who in my opinion is the most experiences local geologist still practising in greenland)"
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)