Hi TD, for once I agree with most of what you posted as I am fully aware of all the points you've raised. I anticipated this development ever since the invention of the calculator, first when it was introduced, then with digital watches, followed by handheld organizers, and eventually the sophisticated computers like of the Commodore computer, not sure if you're old enough to have lived in this period, but from that moment on, I knew it was only a matter of time before pressing a button would put any information right at your fingertips.
Also aware of the good that AI can achieve, for example not only in advancement of technology in research like in the case of flat earth or fake moon landings but also like in detecting misinformation by using natural language processing techniques to identify inconsistencies, sensational language, or dubious sources that often characterize fake news in verify facts by Cross-reference claims with reputable databases, trusted news sources, and verified data to assess their accuracy, also Identify propaganda or bias: Recognize patterns indicative of misinformation campaigns or biased reporting, a classical example is the false narrative put on catholic teaching by protestants, and the anti-cc bias coming from the heart of American Protestantism reinforcing stereotypes or biases present in that.
I also agree that just as any instrument or tool, be it a knife, a pen, or a computer—possesses the inherent potential to serve a multitude of purposes, its moral value is not embedded within the object itself but resides in the intentions and actions of its user. A knife, for example, can be employed to prepare nourishing meals, fostering health and community, or it can be misused to inflict harm and commit acts of violence. tools are morally neutral; it is the moral character, intent, and choices of the individual wielding them that determine whether their use is benevolent or malevolent. The true source of good or evil, therefore, lies not in the object itself but in the human agent who decides how to employ it. This perspective emphasizes the importance of moral responsibility and ethical discernment in our interactions with the tools and technologies at our disposal.
As far as ditching technology again I agree with you, I myself am fully aware of all the points you raised and I try to comply with them as often as possible.
Don’t worry to much, mark my word that “The law of unintended consequences" is much superior then "intention” in many cases, the actual outcomes of actions often diverge significantly from the original.
As human societies, ecosystems, economies, and technological environments are complex, interconnected systems. Small actions or decisions can ripple outward in unforeseen ways, leading to outcomes that were not anticipated.
Even with the best intentions, individuals often lack complete information about all variables and potential reactions within a system, making unintended effects almost inevitable we still need to consider outcomes can differ from intent especially with AI, it is vital to consider possible unintended consequences when designing policies, technologies, or social interventions. Focusing solely on good intentions without accounting for potential side effects can lead to harm despite noble motives, maybe AI can do this who knows
As a dedicated Christian I see opportunities to use it to spread the Gospel
And this is exactly what is happening, with the consequences of the past, Technology is the tool that have emerged from it, with the world being divided especially from the last 500 years in Christianity, the internet is a tool that is bringing out and highlighting the division in Christianity many are waking up to this deception
The last five centuries have witnessed significant fragmentation within Christianity, marked by the Reformation, various theological disagreements, cultural shifts, and differing interpretations of doctrine. This historical context has laid the groundwork for a diverse and often divided Christian landscape.
In this environment, the internet functions as a powerful tool that both exposes and amplifies these divisions. On one hand, it facilitates the rapid dissemination of information. This can lead many individuals to become more aware of the historical and doctrinal differences that have long existed within Christianity, prompting some to question their traditional teachings and recognize underlying divisions.
On the other hand, the internet can also be used to promote misinformation, manipulative narratives, or even deception, which can deepen misunderstandings or foster further division. For many, the digital age has become a catalyst for awakening to perceived deceptions or distortions within religious teachings and where many are wanting to return to the old ways of practicing the faith.
