the question everyone has strangely ignored, page-9

Re-reading all of the threads in the MAK space causes me to wonder whether some of the ' posters' are not getting just a little bit to personal in their comments . I can see a number of genuinely held , but widely divergent , opinions on the future of Fertiliser and RP prices and the future SP / prospects of MAK generally .

I myself am a holder of both shares and ( many ) options . I bought in a few months ago at much higher prices than exist today . Nevertheless I will hold as long as possible . I may lose all my money on the options if they are not still trading by 31/5/10 .

But , despite many doubts , I think that there is still a good story to tell about MAK . The pity is that management is not telling it . I know that Dean Richardson ( Invester Relations Manager ) is playing a straight bat and giving nothing away but you would think that some sort of substantial announcement about the company's expected revenues , costs and resource valuation should be forthcoming from Andrew Drummond ? Despite frequent appearances on Boardroom Radio , and announcement of resource tonnage upgrades , no-one from the company has said , to my knowledge , just what the company is actually WORTH . Tony Sage at CFE does it brilliantly , thus allowing we punters to be fully informed . Not so with MAK . Very disappointing !
In the meantime , gentlemen please add a little decorum to your comments - we should be focussing on the value of the Company , not denigrating each other's genuinely held beliefs .