the real and only question is, page-16

Of course they can get a JV with litigation pending. Why couldn't they?

Even with a successful interdict granted to prevent mining until a full resolution, a binding JV could be entered into.

Of course it would have provisions directly relating to the possible future legal outcomes or effects an interdict would have, but those things alone wouldn't stop it happening if both parties are fully versed on the situation, have contingencies built in and are willing to accept the risks.

As has been stated in one of the "special emails" depending on the realities of the case, there may well be deep pocketed partners ready to throw their legal teams at the challenge....what do we really know? Other than most are sitting on a whopping paper loss and the share price is languishing.

Regards,

DYOR
GLTA