BB, you stated, "If Moby thinks it's rubbish then I rest my case."
Talk about tunnel vision! Moby is your reference. Idso and Idso and their hundreds of references have a little more cred. They are my references in this case, which I now rest.
Moby,
Looking from your mountainous horse, it must be difficult for you to imagine their is any intelligence outside your own level of stratosphere.
I have read enough alarmist scientific commentaries to form an opinion that the "co2 drives climate change" unproven theory has more holes in it than a collander.
Being open-minded I am also prepared to investigate theories about other drivers such as solar activity.
(eg The discovery of the solar heat amplifying effect provides the causal link between historical changes in solar activity and climate change.)
There is a growing tide of scientific data out there for the less myopic and less group-gratifying agw back-patters.
Of course any theory can be called "rubbish" if that is the limit of the intellect used.
