the real reason trading halt, page-6

It's big, or is it bigger?

Does it in anyway impact on MAKs plans to 3 mtpa? and be a billion dollar turnover coy?

So, 72, 110, or the larger resource to 2 bill tonnes require benifcate, what are we talking, 24 years and upward, likely to be for our lifetimes, so immaterial, and i dont think it will impact on the sp.

We all know the sp & MC is still in its embryoic level, so while gestating, it's really immaterial to the full size of resource.

What matters, is that they are able to deleiver on 2-3 mt pa.

Still on target, why else would they aqure 100% of the project.

AGree, likely wanting to get the asx off thier back.
Who really believed that it was 2bt at 23%?
We all knew it was a typo before the asx jumped up and down.


cheers faithful.