Mr Scarpa,I can not see the mica removal circuit in the LTR...

Mr Scarpa,

I can not see the mica removal circuit in the LTR scoping study. In fact there is no reference to mica as prevailing in resources and yet the geological setting, “feldspar-muscovite- spodumene” contains muscovite in other words mica.

What’s your thoughts on this as it is odd the company would not wave this in the markets’ face if there was no mica in its concentrate. They say nothing about mica. And if there is mica at Kathleen then they have not been clear in their scoping study.

Further down south WA

I note A40 is said to be similar in geology to Buldania by LTR and a40 has mica documented.

https://www.ltresources.com.au/sites/default/files/asx-announcements/6917464.pdf

Does LTR have an allergy about commenting on mica?

My HKTD, says the JORC table summary noting muscovite is a big red question mark for LTR