The scamdemic, page-67

  1. gjc
    344 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 13
    Hi fdKen,

    I suspect there is was probably just some “lag” in the reported Covid deaths in the original study data in June 13 study you posted.

    The 118K number of extra deaths would be pretty accurate. I mean, when you’re dead, you’re dead, right? And adding up dead people is easy. Collating what they all died of is harder and takes time. There was possibly a lag in the reporting of the Covid deaths amongst those extra deaths.

    The study attributed 96K to Covid, which was probably accurate at the time the study was done, but a quick check of the Covid death numbers now show at total of 118K Covid deaths in the US at June 13.

    Mystery solved, maybe?

    Now, for the conspiracy buffs amongst us, I have no input on whether the official Covid death figures have been “adjusted” to silence the study?

    Regards, GJC

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.