The Siemens numbers was a red flag., page-78

hi @Vernosc07

Vernosco from my reading I don't think Tomboy has a clue what he is talking about.

DHTEM uses different frequencies at different depths, these frequencies will provide differing Siemens readings. Without looking my bet is the readings @tomboy references above are likely closer to surface and using a different frequency. o

The company said as much in the recent announcement when it stated:

"The survey used moderate base frequency readings, providing a moderate to high conductance estimate of up to 11,000 Siemens, which will potentially increase further with lower base frequency readings"

A pretty easy to understand presentation can be found here https://2019.aegc.com.au/programdirectory/posters/289.pdf

Tomboy is comparing apples and oranges. There is no point having all the high Seimens readings and conductivity if you don't have nickel.

We do have nickel - fact
We know where to drill - fact
We have options being converted flushing the company with money to drill - fact
We have Siemens readings similar to that of other world class finds - fact
We have directors topping up at these prices - fact
And don't forget that big shiny core is going to grade high IMO - results due in next 2 weeks

Plenty more to come here imo