If it's woofer to you, it's not to Creasy at no.2 investor, nor the huge German insto investor at no.1.
They're big enough to see the bigger picture.
I give them serious kudos and they've done their analysis.
This is how some people simplify matters and knowing the big buys have done their analysis, say
"FOLLOW THE MONEY".
But I'm saying something that goes further. I'm saying don't follow the SP as your main indicator, see it in context. See the history in context too.
If you google "short ladder attack" you will come to understand how the little guy gets squeezed and tricked out of their shares.
It happens time and again and another retail investor gets stung and sometimes even swears off the market.
This could be happening here, because there is a disparity between what the big boys are doing and what the SP is doing. It's being held back. The SP refuses to lift significantly, it's stable just above 40c, even on good news. That's all.
How could this be happening? Well if a big accumulator is on the trail they throw out negative messages about the stock until the inevitable happens, and the news flow finally overwhelms sentiment.
That's a big window of opportunity for them and they're jemmying it open.
How? Using shorting as part of the strategy. The idea is to talk the stock down as a way of capturing more shares, cheaply.
They bombard chat with negative messages. Wait they say, until we know for certain.
Well if you wait for certainty you will definitely pay a premium for that in the SP.
Because when the news flow finally overwhelms, it happens quickly and the SP goes parabolic.
So why not try to get ahead of the curve?
In this window of opportunity, how about doing a RISK VS REWARD assessment, using fresh eyes?
This is what the big boys do.
It's what Creasy does, how else did he get so rich?
It's about being dispassionate, and viewing each situation objectively, no emotion. NONE.
What is the cheap accumulation strategy? To churn weak holders into strong hands.
Weak holders? They're the target, not the well-informed. That's why DYOR is the best insurance.
If the weak holders can't look at this with fresh eyes, but always looking to the past, getting emotional, they get weary of hanging on. So on impulse they sell.
Shorters try to trigger using emotive terms. Like 'dog' for instance. It's one powerful word and it has absolutely nothing to commend it except rear vision thinking.
(Not that I'm accusing you personally of anything, there are no shorters disclosures in HC for starters.
That's not a reassurance, it's a fact).
Like I said, AZS needs to be looked at with fresh eyes which is what the big boys constantly do with shares. This is why it pays to not get diverted into personal discussions.
What happens with a short ladder attack? Shareholders get emotional about any paper losses. They get triggered.
People use emotive terms in chat to trigger them.
I'm encouraging holders and potential investors to see the bigger picture and not personalise the discussion.
For some reason some in here keep doing the latter and use perjorative terms about AZS with rear vision thinking. It's a lazy approach at best.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZS
- The Sky's The Limit.
The Sky's The Limit., page-101
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)