I don't suspect anyone as its quite pointless. the name won't be released as the scenario was only used as an example to warn MPs to be more cautious who they trust. Burgess' point was well made yet the Lib supporters seem to want nothing more or less than a name they can call a traitor.
its childish to read Burgess in this way.
do you deny it could be a LibNat, a green, a lab or an independent?
