Trader, it would be better for you if you actually quoted from people who supported your arguments.
In your quote "Manufacturing a gas crisis" by Tristan Edis he ends up by concluding: -
"NSW manufacturers aren’t likely to find themselves without gas, but they will be paying much higher prices."
I believe that this is what most knowledgeable people are saying, and the NSW based manufacturers can't afford the higher gas prices and will shed jobs. When the price gets too high the poorer cannot afford it - exactly the same result as "running out". Tristain also suffers from a fairly glib knowledge of the east coast gas industry, so some of his other commentary is slanted to his particular biases. But the article certainly does not support the argument that you don't need to develop NSW CSG resources
Your mate Pete Danko in Finance Firm Sees Wind, Solar Cost Plunge won't endear himself to your particular band of solar neophytes by suggesting that the subsidies provided for residential scale solar PV are skewing the market
"Residential-scale solar PV in the United States (and elsewhere) is benefiting from the concentration of multiple levels of federal tax subsidies, state-level tax subsidies, and/or feed-in tariffs. Currently, residential-scale solar PV remains expensive by comparison to utility-scale solar PV. Thus, an issue for consideration is whether these subsidies are distorting resource planning in a way that has externalities for the entire set of constituencies benefiting from an integrated electric utility system."
Keep quoting more articles - all you are doing is showing up the precarious nature of your propositions.
