This thread is littered with accusations that homosexuals promote the pedo agenda, that they're unnatural, wrong, violate nature. All of these wonderful comments, and in all your wisdom, you single out my post, as the insensitive one? Come, give me a break.
I find your liberal definition most humorous. If someone is offended, that I continue to consider them bisexual, despite their claims of switching, that is their issue to resolve, not mine. They can identify however they like, and I won't begrudge them for it. A man can dress up in a frock, and I will address them as she if they insist, just to be polite. However if someone asks me was that she, a he, in the past? I'm going to answer yes, that's my definition and I'm entitled to it, and they are entitled to their own.
