Thanks, berretta, han, ben. So when we consider water vapour in the atmosphere, it is clear that we just don't know enough about its cycles, cloud formation, quantity etc. let alone its impact upon other areas of climate change.
This is why I am not prepared to accept AGW propaganda. Because that is all it is. Moreover, lying propaganda. They tell us they have models, peer reviewed models no less, that give meaningful predictions as to what will happen when we release more CO2 into the atmosphere. They are lying. They cannot possibly have such a model, as they have no idea how the major greenhouse gas, water, behaves or even, how much of it there is.
This is the unfortunate aspect of the AGW juggernaut. AGW may well be true, but they have steamrollered the debate with non-science, false information and a supremely arrogant "you must believe us or die" attitude to the extent that it is impossible to find objective, non-IPCC tainted facts or opinions.
