Virtually everyone was brought up pro-vaccine, until either their child died or was injured following vaccination and/or they actually researched the scientific evidence beyond the headlines, soundbites, dogma and “vaccines are safe and effective” mantra. So "ex-vaxxers" is a more accurate label, if one really requires a label.
What is becoming conspicuous is that the pro-health, pro-science, pro-transparency and pro-informed medical consent movement - which is rapidly growing around the world - use science based evidence and rational, logical arguments while welcoming an open and transparent public debate on this vital health issue. In stark contrast, the pro-mandatory vaccination, pro-censorship, anti-informed consent, anti-freedom of speech and anti-debate ideologues instead use dogma, ideology, emotive and irrational straw man arguments, appeals to authority, ad hom attacks and refuse to engage in an open public debate of this all important health matter (including government health authorities, politicians, medical regulators, universities, pharma associations, the media and other vested interests).
The reason they're all so scared to debate this issue is simply because what they claim the science says and what the science actually says are at complete odds. Here's a recent case in point; https://www.bitchute.com/video/obwTC8JB3gy9/
