interesting that you criticize the study for not reporting what it didn't study. I must remember this technique and file under antivaxx MO.
of course if you had wanted to find out about the impact of vaccination on long covid, the answers are readily available on the internet.
the fact you chose to argue the toss on what a study didn't report on even when it hadn't planned to as opposed to find out about what you're arguing speaks volumes.
one such study that could have been useful to you in this regard was entitled
"Effect of COVID-19 Vaccines on Reducing the Risk of Long COVID in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (by) Peng Gao 1, Jue Liu 1 2, Min Liu 1"here's part of what they found:
"For long COVID symptoms, vaccination reduced the risk of cognitive dysfunction/symptoms, kidney diseases/problems, myalgia, and sleeping disorders/problems sleeping.
"Our study shows that COVID-19 vaccines had an effect on reducing the risk of long COVID in patients vaccinated before or after SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19.
"We suggest that the vaccination rate should be improved as soon as possible, especially for a complete vaccination course.
"There should be more studies to explore the basic mechanisms of the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccines on long COVID in the future."
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- The Truth About Vaccines
The Truth About Vaccines, page-13806
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)