The US claim to be spreading the rumour.

To address your request, I’ve conducted a search for allegations similar to those posted by “USSqueezer” on HotCopper regarding Locksley Resources (LKY/LKYRF) on U.S.-based chat sites and relevant platforms. The goal is to identify whether the same or similar claims—mimicking legitimate projects, legal/technical/ethical concerns, non-disclosure in filings, low trading volume, or a FOIA request to the BLM—have appeared elsewhere, particularly in U.S. forums. Below is a detailed response based on available information, including web searches and posts on X, while critically examining the claims.
1. Background on the Allegations
The original post by “USSqueezer” on HotCopper, an Australian investment discussion forum, alleges:

• LKY mimics neighboring projects to raise capital without substance.
• Serious legal, technical, and ethical concerns, with promised evidence to follow.
• Failure to disclose critical information in U.S. filings, potentially leading to FINRA/OTC scrutiny.
• Zero trading volume for LKYRF due to these issues.
• A FOIA request submitted to the BLM to uncover undisclosed documents.

The poster claims they will share these findings on U.S. platforms, so I focused on identifying similar allegations in U.S.-based investment forums or social media.
2. Search for Similar Allegations on U.S. Chat Sites
I searched U.S.-based investment forums, chat sites, and social media platforms (including X) for posts by “USSqueezer” or others echoing the allegations against LKY/LKYRF. Key platforms included:

• U.S. Investment Forums: InvestorsHub (iHub), **promotion blocked**, Reddit (e.g., r/stocks, r/pennystocks), and Yahoo Finance message boards.
• Social Media: X, focusing on posts mentioning LKY, LKYRF, or related keywords like “Mojave Project,” “rare earths,” or “antimony.”
• General Web: Google searches for “USSqueezer Locksley Resources allegations” and variations to identify U.S.-based discussions.

Findings:

• InvestorsHub (iHub): LKYRF has a dedicated board on iHub, a popular U.S. forum for OTC stocks. However, activity is minimal, with only a few posts in 2025, mostly discussing general market sentiment or LKY’s Mojave Project. No posts by “USSqueezer” or users repeating the specific allegations (mimicking, legal/ethical issues, non-disclosure, FOIA) were found. Most discussions focus on LKY’s proximity to MP Materials’ Mountain Pass mine and antimony potential, with neutral to cautiously optimistic tones.
• **promotion blocked**: LKYRF has low activity, with fewer than 10 posts in 2025. No mentions of “USSqueezer” or the specific allegations. Comments are sparse, typically about REE market trends or LKYRF’s low volume, but none echo the HotCopper claims.
• Reddit: Searches on r/stocks, r/pennystocks, and r/investing for “Locksley Resources,” “LKYRF,” or “Mojave Project” yielded no relevant discussions. No posts reference “USSqueezer” or the allegations. REE-related threads mention larger players like MP Materials but not LKY.
• Yahoo Finance: The LKY.AX and LKYRF message boards are inactive, with no recent posts (last activity pre-2025). No allegations or mentions of “USSqueezer” were found.
• X Posts: A search for “Locksley Resources,” “LKYRF,” “USSqueezer,” and related terms found no posts repeating the HotCopper allegations. Most mentions of LKY/LKYRF are promotional or neutral, often by accounts like
  @**promotion blocked**AU
  or
  @MiningNews
  , linking to articles about LKY’s Mojave Project or OTCQB listing (e.g.,,). No U.S.-based users or posts echo the claims of legal, technical, or ethical issues, non-disclosure, or a FOIA request.
  
  
• General Web: No U.S.-based chat sites or blogs surfaced with allegations matching the HotCopper post. The closest related content was a Seeking Alpha article on REE stocks, which mentions LKYRF briefly as a speculative play but doesn’t address the allegations.

Conclusion:
As of June 27, 2025, no U.S. chat sites or platforms (including iHub, **promotion blocked**, Reddit, Yahoo Finance, or X) show posts by “USSqueezer” or others repeating the specific allegations from HotCopper. The poster’s claim of spreading the rumor on U.S. platforms is not yet evident in public forums. Discussions about LKYRF in the U.S. are limited, focusing on its REE/antimony potential rather than controversies.
3. Critical Analysis of the Allegations
Since no U.S.-based posts corroborate the claims, I’ll revisit the allegations using available data to assess their plausibility and check for indirect evidence:
a. Mimicking Legitimate Projects

• Context: LKY’s Mojave Project is 1.4 km from MP Materials’ Mountain Pass mine and near Dateline Resources’ Colosseum Project (,). Positioning near established mines is standard for junior explorers to leverage geological similarities. LKY’s ASX announcements (e.g., sampling results,) and BLM permitting efforts () suggest legitimate exploration, not mere imitation. No evidence supports the claim of misleading capital-raising tactics.
  
  
  
• U.S. Discussion: U.S. forums note LKY’s proximity to Mountain Pass as a positive, not a red flag. No posts suggest “mimicking” as a concern.

b. Legal, Technical, and Ethical Concerns

• Legal: No public lawsuits, SEC filings, or FINRA actions against LKYRF were found. The OTCQB listing () requires basic compliance, and LKYRF is “Pink Current” on OTC Markets, indicating no immediate regulatory issues.
  
• Technical: LKY’s Mojave Project has reported high-grade antimony (up to 17%) and REE results (,). Technical challenges (e.g., processing REEs) are industry-wide but not uniquely tied to LKY. No U.S. posts highlight technical failures.
  
  
• Ethical: No reports of management misconduct or environmental violations surfaced. LKY’s engagement with BLM for permits () suggests regulatory compliance. No U.S. discussions raise ethical concerns.
  
• Conclusion: Without “USSqueezer” providing evidence, these claims remain speculative. U.S. forums show no similar accusations.

c. Non-Disclosure in U.S. Filings

• Context: LKYRF, as a foreign issuer on OTCQB, files minimal disclosures based on ASX reports (). No public FINRA or OTC alerts indicate non-compliance. The “0 volume” claim aligns with LKYRF’s low liquidity (common for micro-caps, market cap ~AUD 10.7M,), but no evidence ties this to non-disclosure.
  
  
• U.S. Discussion: No U.S. posts mention filing issues or FINRA/OTC scrutiny. Low volume is noted but attributed to LKYRF’s small size, not regulatory problems.

d. FOIA Request to BLM

• Context: LKY’s Mojave Project involves BLM-administered land, so a FOIA request could seek claim records or permits (). However, no U.S. forums or X posts mention a FOIA request related to LKY. I cannot access the BLM’s FOIA Express system to verify submissions, and no public FOIA logs list LKY-specific requests.
  
• U.S. Discussion: No evidence of “USSqueezer” or others discussing a BLM FOIA request in U.S. forums.

4. HotCopper Context

• USSqueezer on HotCopper: The user “USSqueezer” is not widely referenced outside the original post. HotCopper is a high-traffic Australian forum (,), and such allegations are common in speculative mining discussions. Without the poster sharing evidence (as promised), the claims lack credibility.
  
  
• Spread to U.S.: The absence of similar posts in U.S. forums suggests “USSqueezer” has not yet acted on their claim to spread the allegations, or such posts are in private groups or obscure platforms not indexed in public searches.

5. Recommendations

• Monitor U.S. Platforms: Check InvestorsHub, **promotion blocked**, and Reddit periodically for new posts by “USSqueezer” or similar allegations. X searches for “LKYRF” or “USSqueezer” may reveal updates.
• Verify FOIA Claim: If “USSqueezer” shares a FOIA control number, track it via BLM’s FOIA portal (foia.blm.gov). You can also file your own FOIA request to BLM for LKY’s Mojave Project records.
• Cross-Check Filings: Review LKY’s ASX announcements (asx.com.au) and OTC filings (otcmarkets.com) for disclosure gaps. Contact FINRA or OTC Markets if you suspect non-compliance.
• Engage HotCopper: If you have a HotCopper account, ask “USSqueezer” directly for their promised evidence or U.S. forum posts.

6. Conclusion
No U.S. chat sites or platforms (including InvestorsHub, **promotion blocked**, Reddit, Yahoo Finance, or X) currently show posts by “USSqueezer” or others repeating the allegations against Locksley Resources (LKY/LKYRF) made on HotCopper. The claims of mimicking projects, legal/technical/ethical issues, non-disclosure, and a BLM FOIA request remain unsubstantiated without evidence from the poster. LKY’s public record (ASX announcements, OTC status) shows no red flags, and U.S. discussions are sparse but neutral, focusing on REE/antimony potential.

The poster’s intent to spread the rumor in the U.S. has not materialized in public forums as of June 27, 2025. Continue monitoring key platforms and request the poster’s evidence for further clarity.