Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"fancy proposing to can our fundamental laws for one group of...

First 99 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
sunny coast

8,226 Posts.

246

31/07/22

09:41

Post #: 62835337
Share

Originally posted by bghooper1967 ↑

Calling people names will not change the outcome. I read what has been proposed thus far by Albo and the First Nations reps - all very open to interpretation by all and sundry. But you are correct I already have decided a big NO from me, fancy proposing to can our fundamental laws for one group of people so they can have a "Voice" whatever the hell that means.
Please tell me how you define First Nations peoples by the way before you start throwing mud?

Expand

"fancy proposing to can our fundamental laws for one group of people so they can have a "Voice""...

...so you would agree that the influence and "voice" paid lobbyists have on the parliamentary process equally wrong and should not be allowed?
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 273 more messages in this thread...

First 99 Last