The War Is Lost for NATO, will Selinsky end up like Sadam etc...
Now that it has become clear to all experts that Kiev cannot win this war even with the help of NATO, the dilemma is great. A turnaround could only be achieved if NATO actively intervenes with its own troops, and that is to be avoided at all costs. But how can one get out of this mess? Without losing face? How can one wriggle out of the adulation for corrupt Kiev with which support is sold to the media-damaged consumers? The desperate way will be to reverse the well-known lies with which the USA has always justified its great wars of aggression and destruction.
The US has so far often accused its chosen enemies of an act of war that it did not commit in order to attack and destroy that enemy country. It seems that this time they want to turn the tables in their misery. They have served up a fairy tale to the world to justify why they will stop supporting Ukraine; why they will drop Kiev just as ruthlessly as they started their war against Russia in Ukraine. How could one still support a country that has committed an act of terrorism against allied NATO countries? How can the FRG still court and support Kiev when the criminals there have sabotaged the energy supply of all of Europe? Does that sound far-fetched? Let's look at what the RAND Corporation, an influential US think tank, recommended to the government in Washington in January 2023:
The RAND Corporation Recommends Immediate WithdrawalDie RAND-Corporation empfiehlt sofortigen RückzugIt should "withdraw from the Ukraine adventure as soon as possible because sanctions have failed to destroy Russia's economy and isolate Russia internationally." However, supporting Ukraine is very expensive and, according to RAND, the US has nothing to gain in the process that is worth the price, because how the border between Ukraine and Russia is drawn is unimportant to the US. Therefore, RAND even recommended recognising Russia's territorial gains and easing Russia sanctions to bring an end to the expensive adventure. RAND were the same ones who previously advocated provoking and overstretching Russia. So obviously their advice is being followed and that brings me back to the question of how this could be done without losing face. Probably with this new fairy tale.
This volte-face kills several birds with one stone.
First, the US wants to 'prove' that it was not the perpetrator. Then it can be claimed that before this terrorist act by Kiev, no one could have known what a brainchild Selensky &Co really are, because this act was of course carried out without having obtained permission from Washington. One was completely surprised by this monstrosity and so one can just as surprisingly pull all NATO countries out of this mess. Furthermore, the NATO countries will then no longer have to carry out the deliveries of heavy equipment, which were only half-heartedly promised anyway and which have already dangerously reduced the means of self-defence. The Ukraine adventure can be ended and one can then concentrate on the planned war against China. The FRG can also breathe a sigh of relief by declaring to Russia that it has been taken in by Kiev's lies just as Moscow has. I didn't mean it that way… Nevertheless, the USA has succeeded in massively damaging the competitiveness of its competitors in Europe.
more here, worth a read folks
https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_–_Sign_of_the_Times_SE_55
