PLS 2.81% $3.11 pilbara minerals limited

Not true for so many different reasons given that...

  1. 1,202 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 40
    Not true for so many different reasons given that infrastructural costs alone at AVZ will require increasingly high CAPEX, hydro-electricity isn't going to cheap, nor will it be reliable (~300-400 MIL USD of CAPEX for starters). Just ask Glencore, it has had to import power a lot of time from Zambian power companies. This fact combined with the extremely high royalties that (~40%) that the Congo Nat'l mining company will want from revenues, will ensure that less is given back to the investors. We aren't even talking about the ethical concerns that will be risen from mining in the Congo. Offtakes that are non-Chinese will be challenging for AVZ to have, especially if all these companies have ethical options available. By that time, PLS will have approached steady-state high output production, and reached large scales of economy to far undercut any of its rivals.

    Time will tell, I suppose.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
$3.11
Change
-0.090(2.81%)
Mkt cap ! $9.360B
Open High Low Value Volume
$3.15 $3.17 $3.06 $206.5M 66.15M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
3 212414 $3.11
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$3.12 1870994 18
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
PLS (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.