g'day Wang. no red mist.... no shooting the messenger (I didn't...

g'day Wang. no red mist.... no shooting the messenger (I didn't give ktrianta a serve) as McCrann has been a notable anti-science, anti-GW, anti-renewables for a long time. his arguments are obviously emotionally coloured, for eg.

"In its cowardice, it’s also signed up to the “mad, bad and – seriously – dangerous” rush to wind and solar, enough batteries hopefully included, so peerlessly executed by Bowen."

is this a rational statement of fact? or is not merely scare-mongering with no sources, just a scathing opinion.