In my view the only thing Pell is guilty of is being a high profile catholic priest.
Their is no possibility that the evidence was belong reasonable doubt.
The evidence was
1.The victim said he did it 2. Pell said he did not do it 3. Pells defense also came up with more than 10 extra reasons why it was highly improvable that he did it
This happened 20 years ago.
This is like a women claiming I raped her 20 years ago and that is enough for me to be found guilty.
In my view this has been a disgraceful witch hunt by all the Catholic hating media.