You live in a lovely, comfortable world where your every thought is absolute truth and everything beyond your comprehension is just lies.
But what you've given is a reasonably close narrative of what actually happened. You just can't comprehend it. So I'll explain it in terms that are hopefully simple enough for you to understand:
"One day you own and have no sentiment" – correct... here's the last post I made before the trading resumed:
" the next day you have a buy sentiment and don't own" – also correct, "Not held" because I sold in the auction, and "Buy" because I intended to buy back either in the SPP or on market. Any issues so far? Here's a post I made shortly after the auction resolved. That's the post I showed above.
"then you sold out and were going to buy back in the raise, then you didn't and bought back on market" – also correct.
What I don't understand is why you think that a perfectly reasonable sequence of trades is so difficult for you to understand!
(20min delay)