IMO this thread is off the rails.Consider, if one of the big 4...

  1. 1,791 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 254
    IMO this thread is off the rails.
    Consider, if one of the big 4 got into trouble the other 3 + the Reserve Bank would pile in otherwise the dominoes fall - banking is all about trust and confidence.
    If one of the smaller banks got into trouble then one of the big 4 would take it over otherwise the Reserve Bank would step in manage the windup.
    The older punters on here would remember the Bank of Adelaide demise/take-over by the ANZ - all controlled and watched over by the Reserve.
    Besides published reserves the majors all have hidden reserves - it would take a team of forensic accountants full access to the details behind the balance sheets to unravel.
    I agree though if anyone on here has lets say$100m + plus then yes,prudence requires a split - spread over all the majors. Why? Just so your imagination is put to rest and you can sleep at night.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.