CLIMATE SCIENCE 2022 Nobel Prize Winner: For his contribution to Quantum Physics. “Climate Science has Metastasised into … Pseudoscience” NOBEL LAUREATE: “CLIMATE SCIENCE HAS METASTASIZED INTO MASSIVE SHOCK-JOURNALISTIC PSEUDOSCIENCE” Dr. John F. Clauser, joint recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, has criticized the climate emergency narrative calling it “a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.” Along with two others, Dr Clauser, an experimental and theoretical physicist, was the 2022 recipient of the Nobel Prize for work done in the 1970s that showed “quantum entanglement” allowed particles such as photons, effectively, to interact at great distances, seemingly to require communication exceeding the speed of light. He has criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming, according to a coalition of scientists and commentators who argue that an informed discussion about CO2 would recognise its importance in sustaining plant life. In a statement issued by the CO2 coalition, Nobel Laureate John Clauser Elected to CO2 Coalition Board of Directors – CO2 Coalition Dr. Clauser said that “there is no climate crisis and that increasing CO2 concentrations will benefit the world” … Read more: Nobel Laureate: “Climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience” - Nobel Laureate: “Climate science has metastasized into massive shock-jou... Thade Andy "In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis." What can I say? Dr. Clauser actually HAS a Nobel Prize in Physics, unlike say leading climate alarmist Dr. Michael Mann, whoapparently confused a certificate of contribution with actually being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Dr. Clauser is not the only Nobel Laureate to slam climate science. Jo Nova points out Ivar Giaever who won a Nobel for tunneling in superconductors in 1972, and Robert Laughlin who won the 1998 Physics Nobel Prize for his explanation of the fractional quantum Hall effect are also climate skeptics. Nobel prize winner — Ivar Giaever — “climate change is pseudoscience” « ... Robert Laughlin's Profile | Stanford Profiles Robert Laughlin is part of Stanford Profiles, official site for faculty, postdocs, students and staff informatio... Fractional quantum Hall effect - Wikipedia The microscopic origin of the FQHE is a major research topic in condensed matter physics. https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-10-22/s71022-20132171-302668.pdf PROF. WILLIAM HAPPER and PROF.RICHARD LINDZEN CONCLUSIONThus, in our opinion, science demonstrates that there is no climate emergency and no climate related risk caused by fossil fuels and CO2. Therefore, there is no reliable scientific evidence that supports the SEC proposed rule. Further, contrary to what is commonly reported, CO2 is essential to life on earth. Without CO2, there would be no photosynthesis, and thus no plant food and not enough oxygen to breathe. Moreover, without fossil fuels there will be no reliable, low-cost energy worldwide and less CO2 for photosynthesis making food. Eliminating fossil fuels and reducing CO2 emissions will be disastrous for the United States and the rest of the word, especially for lower-income people.