there is an argument that having more shares issued to cornerstone investors at a premium allows the register to be a bit looser (assuming they on sell them at some point) to eventually track higher. It's not always just about dilution to existing shareholders without upside. As mentioned I don't think they need it now, but I have no issue with them issuing shares at a premium at the right time to be able to develop assets. Am I wrong saying that most large companies have more shares on issue that BTR? Legit question and not baiting, it's just my thought that there is a balance between having too few shares on issue to put off the big guys taking a big stake, because buying on market is very costly to having too many where it's hard to provide scarcity. I may be very wrong as I have no real experience in this field, but just an observation
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- things are heating up
there is an argument that having more shares issued to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BTR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $100.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.8¢ | 1.8¢ | 1.7¢ | $101.5K | 5.667M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 5851119 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.8¢ | 3737444 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 5851119 | 0.017 |
40 | 11621766 | 0.016 |
33 | 7763000 | 0.015 |
11 | 5601056 | 0.014 |
9 | 3205308 | 0.013 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.018 | 3737444 | 5 |
0.019 | 5623461 | 17 |
0.020 | 8766337 | 15 |
0.021 | 6731192 | 10 |
0.022 | 9058449 | 18 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BTR (ASX) Chart |