Pugnacious if you read back on a few posts I have been talking about how we all read the headlines and don't do any research into what people cut and paste. If you go back to post 8309 on prop thread ( about UK property) and read through thread I was exposing how a headline can say one thing yet it is completely wrong in the context of the story what Aurelius1 posted. And like what jimrogers posted a graph and was infered that it was our market. My headline was a toungue in cheek dig back at the cut and paste brigade that a headline can mean nothing or anything unless one researches and actually knows what is going on. So pugnacious thank you you are just proving my point about half the stuff what people post is manipulated to give there argument creditability and nothing beats one own research.
