Fully agree Buckland and Aptay1 and further re recent posts...

Fully agree Buckland and Aptay1 and further re recent posts talking of past to semi-recent losses. If you are genuine and it is not due to your own error, very recent selling out and/or suddenly in light of recent positive announcements becoming emotional, or even simply to take a loss against other gains made perhaps on other larger companies and tired of waiting etc., I genuinely commiserate with you and provide further explanation below.

BUT if your not stop ?scare trading by fear?.

Upfront, I genuinely apologise to anyone who is genuine and has made a genuine loss on this stock, (sorry I do not refer here to you day/short term traders, that?s the nature and risk of your game), as I do indeed genuinely feel for you, and I do know what it is like, having suffered some substantial losses in the past myself.

To put this further into some perspective, it has already been clearly indicated in the semi-recent past, that there are many others still currently holding who would suffer a similar loss to yourself, along with many others, I believe including myself, who I suggest would suffer even greater losses than that recently posted or referred to, should STI not succeed. And, I suggest from observations, many of those, like me, have also been investing in STI for over 12 months or more,. Please note, I state this as believed fact, and not in order to make any form of emotional appeal to others.

I have also had the experience of loosing money on shares promoted by others saying they have previously made money on this stock/done well etc., and equally made money on stocks that other?s have said they have lost money on and called them dogs. This has also applied to both sardine shares and respectable size company shares, and therefore I believe it often can mean very little unless : ?You do your own research and form your own opinion?, there is a substantial reason for it.

Also contemplate that if I said I?d made a profit on a share previously, you then bought some and incurred a loss, you would still think my information sucked and vise versa, if i told you I's made a loss on a particlar share, which influenced you not to buy and it then went up, again you would still think my post sucked ?

Also many other companies starting out, some which are now quite large and profitable today, went through the same growing pains, the ups and downs, and criticism by shareholders, including their CEO?s, but made it regardless, and now being a fairly large and secure company, I suggest probably quite definitely don?t give a rats what you think anyway, because they have the money.

The difference : they are no longer having to try to raise money in the first place just to get their products up an running anymore ?
Think about it ?
If you have good reason to believe in a company, how do you help it succed ?
The only way is to ?Do your own research, make your own decisions?, and then don?t blame others for your loss or profit ?

Regardless, even if genuine, I do not find this type of $ loss, post along with it?s potentially emotional negative sentiment at all help full, and strongly suggest that it is the current status of STI, which I suggest is now considerably different than it has been ever before that warrants investors attention in making their decision, not historical losses. Surely, like any other company, large or small it is the, now consideration, that should be used to determine your risk profile toward the company.

Also understandable, even for genuine investors, is that it could also amount to getting sick of waiting and with no reassurance because the SP is still stuck down at 0.004 cents and (make up your own mind) the possibly some of these people got out in fact too soon after waiting all that time, having incurred a loss, spit it and won?t buy back in. Can?t necessarily blame them, and I can only say it is a pity, my condolences and again I have done the same in the past. Again sorry for your loss and I may be wrong, but I believe the best is yet to come and you did get out too early after waitinmg all that time.

Again however, if none of the alternatives above fit, I can only consider it to be ?scare trading by fear? and question you motives.

Should I be suspicious, probably, although I can never be sure. But Why Now, considering the semi critical (not make and break, as STI are finally up and running, producing, selling etc, and I believe therefore moving past that point), but I do mean to more speedily stand substantial near term success and move forward with financial support and subsequently achieve a nearer term rise in the SP, and knowing there are still the day/short term traders, the doubters, the negative posters and maybe those representing those who do not want to see this happen ?

Major, Minor, Minow pharmaceutical : may want the product/company for nothing/dirt cheap, may not want the product competition so destroy and bury, or even just get them to offer contracts/products at a much lower price than has been suggested in previous meetings, (eg. the HDA, which is after all a product capable of big money and is a product they are already indicated they are asking big money/conditions for in their early talks with interested major pharma?s?). Nothing to say they do not try to undercut/overpay or short circuit existing business arrangements, or even play the market against STI to achieve same. Be klittle more than a game of crib to them. After all business is all about the buck, make no mistake.

And yes everybody knows STI is locked into 0.004 cents until at least early May, 2011, if not a bit past, and yes everybody including me was disappointed with SPP offer at that level without attaching options. However look at what STI is now, currently, then add the immediate likely known future and I suggest the 0.004 to 0.005 is still cheap compared to the near future.

Some have suggested day/short term traders are no longer with us. Apologies but I definitely don?t believe that. You only have to look at the large volumes and patterns of shares bought, sold and offered as the share price declined down to 0.004, and the attempts at 0.003. Even now look at 76 offers to buy at 0.003 cents (6.7 million shares), and 62 offers to sell at 0.005 cents (6.2 million shares), and I believe it is obvious. On the way up the same game will probably be played and this too continues to slow progress to achieve increases in the SP.

I apologise for another lengthy post, but do my best to give accurate information where possible, proper reasoning for statements made, expose folly in thinking where apparent, and try to promote thought based on fact, not emotion where ever possible, which is still the hardest thing of all to do and I?m still learning.

Why : because the experts tells us that there is no room in share trading for emotion and that will always be our downfall ?

Given the current quite positive achievements of STI, the highly credentialed an experienced ?Team? in the 3 plus company/STI company, the current manufacturing with further contracts to be finalized shortly, stock now in hand of ?nexcare? and ?futuro? products to sell to Australian pharmacies along anti-aging cream and others, soon to be announced kidney vital product, spin off of Telemedcare presumably for cash along with possible shareholder involvement, and the slightly longer term development of big money items such as the HDA, Immunoxel, and some 25 further products to be developed, I believe the potential is very real for subsequent success and a substantial rise in the SP, the speed of which will no doubt be determined to a large extent by the cash available to develop it ?

For any of those who may require a reference to the ?Team? and the likely products, my post of 30/3/11, amongst others would act as a reference.

By all means please refer to other post around it, because as always :

?Do your own research, make your own decisions?.

I only accept responsibility for my mistakes, not any one else?s, and I strongly suggest you must accept responsibility for yours and not blame others.