You did that by quoting the Phil, to suggest it was effectively speaking of a pre-existing Jesus, pretty much emptying himself before coming.
Where did I "suggest" that when I quoted a passage that Jesus took on the nature of a servant?
Front up or have the courage to admit that you were wrong.
That was previously posted.
---
It is @wotsup that has problems because he cannot support his own lies or admit that he was wrong.
Come on @wotsup be a man and show us where @whereu effectively suggested a pre-existing Jesus when quoting the verse in Philippians that said Jesus took on the nature of a servant or admit that you were wrong.
or
Are you suggesting that scripture suggested a pre-existing Jesus?
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- This is a very important message for those who do not know God.
This is a very important message for those who do not know God., page-340
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online