Your outright dismissal that it was even possible she was raped suggests it's your version that was slanted. All I've written is that her subsequent action doesn't exclude it as possible she was raped....which it doesn't. Given the difficulty of determining precisely what happened, one area where Porter will be judged politically is on the accuracy and honesty of his recollection. I can't access the article, so it would be interesting to know if the events outlined in the report are inconsistent with the version of events that Porter has placed on the record regarding how much contact he had with the woman concerned.
