I thought my job was done here. It's obviously not.
"Very very suspicious the counting too, the way Trump was so very comfortably ahead and then by work of who knows what trickery Biden gained the lead."
"As to the voting and the way it so very very oddly turned against Trump and for Biden, the whole affairs is very dubious."
*
You show no actual comprehension of how voting systems and the reporting of them work. Do you know about how postal votes actually work? And they are counted after election day votes? And they are frequently reported in bulk? And in the scenario of this election Biden got a significant majority from heavily suburban Democratic leaning areas? And that the reporting system is working exactly as it should be?
It was almost certain that Trump was going to be leading after election day and Biden would come back a bit later on. You need to provide clear, proven evidence that election fraud has taken place, otherwise your ascertains are baseless. Context. Just because something is suspicious doesn't always mean it is - it requires critical thinking to know the difference or be open to the understanding that there may be a difference or an admission that you simply might not understand something.
Also - you'd better not ever vote by post in an Australian election because the system is almost identical and your vote will be counted and reported in an almost identical way. I am sure the Australian Electoral Commission will welcome your call on the matter tomorrow.
By the way, common nouns aren't capitalised in sentences.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- This is not a Victory for America.
This is not a Victory for America., page-8
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 80 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)